| The Washington Canard Where C-SPAN is the local TV news |
|
Friday, April 09, 2004
MADDON'! James Lileks, on "The Sopranos," in his latest Bleat:
Or he dies. I think that's what they'll do. I think the fall of Tony Soprano would make for a season even better than this one, and this one is exceptional. The pattern above is that bad things will happen to the main characters -- Sopranos family members, mostly -- but they don't get killed. Or at least they haven't been. Already Adriana has been talking to the feds for almost a season and a half, and if Christopher is supposed to be Tony's successor, one or both of them will be dead, in prison or in the witness protection program by the end of the series. With the latest episode, one can see how Tony might now find out. Killing Adriana might keep him out of prison, but it would destroy his relationship with Christopher. And what of A.J.? Doesn't seem like he'll be going to college right now -- will he meet the same fate as Jackie Jr.? Will Carmela walk away from the awful comprimise she's lived for most of her life? All told, there is no way for this show to end happily, and nor should it. I say the more carnage the better. David Chase's contention that there will never be a "Sopranos" feature film would seem to reinforce the assumption that the whole thing will be blown apart by the end of Season 6. The anticipation of all this makes for some damn compelling TV. I just hope the way it plays out won't be a letdown. P.S. There's a fairly interesting thread about this over at Television Without Pity. I'd say the consensus is most everybody ends up "dead dead dead" and those who don't are left with pathetic, miserable lives. I'm counting on it. |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||